CW LEONIS – Why it may not be what is claimed.
There has been a lot of discussion on related threads about the googlesky image of CW Leonis, the brightest object in the night time sky in infrared, being Elenin/Nibiru. I would like to share my position on this with you. I do not insist that I am right, because I know even if I appear right today, others will follow that will provide new evidence for new theories that make the old obsolete.
Over the past few years, astronomy appears to have advanced leaps and bounds, but we always need to take a step back sometimes before we can move forward. Astronomy took a big step backwards in the late 90s, but they don’t even realize it. I am referring to quasars not experiencing time dilation and their redshift not being related to distance.
Light redshift has been used to determine distance to cosmic objects that are very far away. Quasars have the most redshift of all cosmic objects indicating they are billions of lightyears (LY) away.
However, recently Nasa discovered a quasar that has a redshift indicating a distance of 10 billion LY from Earth. It appears adjacent to a much closer galaxy that is only about a 100 million LY away. Then they found another and another, Some appear closer, some farther. New technology revealed that the quasars are connected to the closer galaxy by electromagnetic (EM) plasma indicating that the quasar and galaxy are actually neighbors and that redshift is unreliable for estimating distance. This just destroyed Astronomy, but no one is accepting it. People who work their whole lives have a hard time accepting new facts that contradict their beliefs. Ask a religious fanatic.
This paper explains the controversy.
Consider the distance reported for CW Leonis (600 LY) could be off by a factor up to a 1,000+. Remember CW Leonis is thought to be a red giant that is the brightest object in the sky in infrared. The infrared image may be caused by the same type of EM that may cause redshift errors with quasars. A factor of six orders of magnitude would put CW Leonis about 0.0006 LY or 367 AUs or 3.9E9 miles away when the photo was taken. A factor of 6E6 places CW Leonis about where Nasa says Elenin is when the infrared photo was taken.
Also, CW Leonis out shines all stars in the sky except the sun in the infrared. If it’s the brightest thing in the sky besides our sun, shouldn’t we consider it closer than most stars and investigate the possibility that this object is our sun’s binary partner, but we didn’t because redshift says its not so. Shouldn’t astronomy be rethinking these old theories based on obviously flawed assumptions? Why is astronomy dodging the truth? Because as Jack Nicolson once said, “You can’t handle the truth.”
CW Leonis is reported to be moving directly toward us at high speed. Therefore, its location in the sky should stay relatively the same until its approach is close enough to be detected by movement of the Earth around the sun. It was discovered in 1969 and its heading directly toward us. I can’t find any recent location data on this. Can you?
In an expanding universe, I would expect a red giant to be moving away from us like everything else and not directly at us. Objects in space flying straight at us may be flying at us because of gravitational attraction. Therefore, I conclude that the infrared image in googlesky could be Elenin/Nibiru heading for a sling shot around the sun and the infrared signature is caused by the objects extreme EM field. The EM field causes additional redshift proportional to the EM field strength.
We can choose to believe those that continue to rely on methods that are proven to be flawed, or we can start over fresh with new ideas that make logical sense. Staying the present course and denying the facts because of political correctness is absolutely crazy and is turning science into a religion. Do we really need another one? We already have the new religion of “Man-made Global Warming.”
There isn’t a current replacement for redshift calculations that I know of, so everybody turns their nose up at the current discovery by saying quasars are the only cosmic body known to be affected by this discovery with no other explanation. I say take another look. They are pushing their blunder under the rug and ignoring it so that they can all continue to get a paycheck; and not have to admit to themselves the embarrassing mistake, thereby, preserving their ego and avoiding ridicule, and most importantly, to hide the truth and consequences.
We appear to reside in an dynamic living electric universe. Quasars resemble an EM effect. In fact quasars have been observed within galaxies. In a sense, a pregnant galaxy with a quasar embryo that gives birth to a new galaxy, a quasar. The EM ropes (plasma discharge) that connect the ejected galaxy is the quasars umbilical cord that provides life sustaining EM power to feed the birth of stars. If you have wondered why quasars appear so old, maybe they only appear this way when they are young, feeding and growing.
We need to start thinking of the universe as alive and understand life is everywhere. This is the secret those in real power do not want you to know because they won’t be able to maintain security at the prison planet.